Gen Z Isn’t Bad at Workplace Communication—Your Company Is Bad at Explaining Its Rules



For all the talk about generational differences at work, some of the biggest clashes show up in ordinary moments.

Take being late. A Gen Z employee in her 20s works at a small café owned by a Gen X manager. When she realized she was going to be late, she texted him. He was frustrated. To him, being late was serious enough to warrant a phone call. A text felt casual and impersonal.

She saw it completely differently.

“He’s super busy, so I felt a call was going to take up too much time,” she said. “So I texted. I thought it was more considerate.”

Both believed they were being respectful. They just had different definitions of what respect looks like.

 The real issue isn’t manners—it’s unspoken rules

I study workplace culture and communication, and these misunderstandings are becoming more common as Gen Z moves deeper into the workforce. The oldest members are approaching 30. The youngest are still in school.


What’s distinctive about many older Gen Z workers is that they entered college, internships, or first jobs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Communication shifted online. Masks covered faces. And now AI is reshaping how we write and interact all over again.


This doesn’t mean Gen Z communicates better or worse than previous generations. It means they learned in a different environment—and many of the “obvious” rules were never explained to them.


When a text means something more

It’s easy to dismiss the café example as “kids these days prefer texting.” That misses the point. The employee wasn’t avoiding her boss. She thought she was respecting his time.


For the manager, the phone call itself carried meaning. It signaled that she understood the seriousness of being late.


Neither had stated that expectation out loud.


Managers shouldn’t assume employees attach the same meaning to a phone call, a text, or a Slack message. If being late requires a call, say so. A two-minute conversation about expectations can stop both people from walking away thinking the other was disrespectful.


 Openness vs. oversharing

Another frequent friction point is personal disclosure.


One Gen Z worker at a large New England company told his baby-boomer manager about his severe anxiety. The manager was sympathetic—but also uneasy.


“It made me feel uncomfortable, if I’m being honest,” the manager said. “I didn’t want to downplay his anxiety, but I’m not sure I needed to know.”


His reaction wasn’t denial that anxiety is real. He simply questioned how much of it belonged in their professional relationship.


Many older workers learned that professionalism means clear boundaries between personal and work life. Gen Z has come of age when conversations about mental health are far more public. What feels like honesty to one person can feel like oversharing to another.


Managers don’t need to become therapists. Employees don’t need to share everything. But both sides need to recognize that comfort levels around disclosure aren’t universal.


 Learning to “read the room” when the room disappeared

A lot of workplace communication is unspoken. People traditionally learned to read a room by watching faces around a conference table, noticing a shift in tone, or getting a quiet debrief after a meeting.


Now picture someone who was 18 or 19 in 2020. At the exact age when many would have been absorbing those unwritten signals in classes, internships, and early jobs, the room vanished. Classes went online. Internships became remote. Masks later made facial cues harder to read.


That doesn’t mean Gen Z can’t read faces. It means we shouldn’t assume everyone had the same opportunities to learn the quiet signals of professional life. If feedback matters, managers should say it out loud. A disappointed expression on a Zoom call is a poor substitute for a conversation.


 “I thought that was understood”

Imagine a manager says, “I need this by Friday.” The employee delivers it at 4:30 p.m. The manager is annoyed—they planned to review it that morning, make changes, and pass it along. The employee is confused. The deadline was Friday, and they hit it.


This kind of mismatch is common. In a survey of 250 Gen Z professionals, clear structural expectations ranked alongside fairness and empathetic engagement as top themes.


Wanting clarity is not the same as needing hand-holding. An employee can want autonomy and still need to know exactly what success looks like. “Friday” and “Friday by 10 a.m. so I have three hours to review this” are not the same instruction.


 AI makes the problem bigger, not smaller

We can now generate polished emails, summarize meetings, and produce information faster than ever. More communication does not automatically create more understanding.


The larger lesson applies to every generation working together: We often mistake the workplace norms we learned for common sense. They’re not. They were shaped by the technologies, workplaces, and historical moments in which we started our careers.


Gen Z is learning theirs in a very different world. The companies that will work best across generations are the ones willing to stop assuming and start explaining.

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post