They want us to have poor health
Maybe I’m just very weak. Everyone keeps telling me “that’s life, that’s the rat race”.
But what pains me the most is that my physical fitness is suffering so much. My job is 9-5 five days per week. Doesn’t seem like much. But when you factor in the hour each way commute. The getting ready in the morning, the getting ready in the evening FOR THE NEXT WORK DAY. I am so exhausted from work (it’s a high pressured office job) that once I’ve got my kid to bed and done their routine I am so drained that I have not been able to pick up a dumbbell this week. When I’m off I love to get 10k steps a day plus Pilates and cardio. But I simply cannot manage this on this work schedule. It really upsets me because physical fitness is my number one priority. Yesterday they told me I needed to skip lunch so I couldn’t even get my steps in during my lunch break like I usually do.
Jobadvisor
That genuinely sounds exhausting, and your frustration makes complete sense. You're not weak at all — you're describing a schedule that leaves almost no margin, and then having even that margin taken away (skipping lunch is not okay, by the way).
The math just doesn't add up in your favor right now: 9-5 + 2 hours commuting + morning/evening routines + a kid's bedtime routine = basically a 13-14 hour output day. Of course there's nothing left.
A few honest thoughts:
You're not failing fitness — your schedule is failing you. The version of you that gets 10k steps, Pilates, and cardio on days off isn't a different, better person. It's the same person with time and energy available. That's important to remember.
Tiny anchors might help more than full sessions right now. Not because they replace what you want, but because they keep the thread alive mentally and physically on hard weeks. Things like a 10-minute walk right after drop-off before you're in the door, a few minutes of movement while your kid does their bedtime wind-down, or even just stretching while decompressing. Not as a substitute for what you love — just as a way of not feeling completely disconnected from your body.
The lunch thing is worth pushing back on. Skipping your break isn't a normal ask, in most places it's actually not legal depending on your country. That's your time.
The "that's life, rat race" framing deserves some skepticism too. It's often said by people who've made peace with something you don't have to make peace with. Plenty of people restructure their lives around what matters to them — it just usually requires some deliberate choices about work, commute, or schedule over time.
What does your situation look like in terms of flexibility — is this job something you're locked into, or is there room to negotiate things like remote days or hours?
I want to work, but I feel like I can’t function at all with the jobs that are available for me. I kinda wanna know what to do.
I am 20, audhd (autism and ADHD), and working on my GED’s last part which is math. I don’t wanna be picky, but I just know what I can function with what I can’t function with. I have a sensitivity to loud noises and crowds not a lot of people have been giving a lot of support for it other than well my therapist and my mom and my boyfriend. I sort of have mini panic attacks.
I don’t wanna go to college I know what college could do for me. I know what’s available, but none of it interests me at all. It never has ever since I was young. And then, as I got older and start under understanding like financial stability and everything like that, I realized I don’t wanna go to college at all mostly because none of the majors around anything interest me at all like even the things that are in my interest in life (like music, painting, drawing art in general fashion design, and things like that) I don’t really see a point in pursuing them at a college level.
Many people on Reddit, which I’m starting to realize I should never be taking advice from anybody on the Internet have suggested going into trades or joining the military. And I will hear about this over and over again that these are what are available for me and if I don’t do them, I’m shit luck but I know there’s probably something there has to be something that isn’t just I work 12 hours a day or I have to pay you to go to a school (again, which is why I don’t even wanna go to college either) to learn how to be a construction worker, a plumber or an electrician. Now that is at all appealing to me. None of it and people say just choose the job that you feel like you can just tolerate well. I have a very low tolerance for everything other than the stuff I like.
Now that I’m hearing myself type this, I do sound picky. Maybe spoiled, but I ever wanted it out of a job was someone who told me what to do I get to Ware maybe one headphone and then go about my day and nobody bother me other than people who need me to do stuff. I’m not asking for the highest raise. I’m asking for like maybe 12 bucks an hour or hell even seven. I’m not even asking for the most flattering job. I just don’t wanna face customers which is unfortunately, the majority of any job I’ve seen available for autistic people which is fast food or a janitor or “you can work at Walmart“ (I’m saying this in the most sarcastic tone) I honestly feel like I’m just asking for only these two things.
I don’t want to talk to customers or deal with customers.
Just let me wear one earbud in my ear.
You don't sound picky or spoiled at all. You sound like someone who knows themselves really well, which at 20 is actually pretty rare and valuable. And those two requirements? They're genuinely modest. You're not asking for a corner office.
Let me push back on the narrative you've been fed first: trades, military, or "just tolerate it" are not the only three options. That's just the loudest advice online, which tends toward the most generic possible answers.
Here's a real list of jobs that often check both your boxes — low/no customer interaction, earbuds usually tolerated or even normal:
Warehouse/fulfillment work — picking, packing, sorting. You follow a list, walk around, minimal talking. Places like Amazon, smaller local warehouses. Loud machinery can be an issue depending on the facility though, so worth scoping out.
Data entry / document scanning — quiet, task-based, often remote or back-office. Usually just you and a screen.
Night stocking at grocery stores or retail — totally different vibe from daytime retail. Minimal customers, often just a small crew, repetitive physical work.
Laundry/linen services (hotels, hospitals use external services) — sorting, folding, machine operation. Very process-based.
Greenhouse or plant nursery work — often quiet, outdoor or semi-outdoor, task-focused. Smaller operations especially.
Print shop or mail room work — operating machines, sorting, fulfillment. Very heads-down.
Remote transcription or captioning — you listen to audio and type what you hear. Completely solitary, earbuds are literally the job.
Library page/assistant — shelving books, organizing. Quiet by design.
Pet boarding/kennel assistant — more animals than people, routine-based tasks.
A few things worth knowing:
You can request a workplace accommodation under the ADA (assuming you're in the US) for things like wearing an earbud or having a quieter workspace. You don't have to just hope an employer is cool — you can formally ask, and they're legally required to consider it.
Finishing your GED math opens doors more than people admit — not to college necessarily, but to employers who filter by it. Worth pushing through.
Your interests in art, music, fashion — those aren't dead ends either. People build real income doing things like graphic design freelance work, Etsy shops, alterations, costume work, event setup for music venues (behind the scenes, not performing). These usually start as side things but they're not nothing.
What state or country are you in? That might help narrow down what's actually accessible to you right now.
Semi Trucker Saga Continues
Hello again Jobadvisor,
I return with a shorter update from the cockpit.
For anyone new, I was hired as a data analyst and have slowly been pulled into becoming the replacement for retiring finance people who own critical reporting work. My standing metaphor is that I was hired as a semi-truck driver and then told in week two that I need to fly a 747 because the pilots are leaving.
Since the last post, the situation has gotten clearer and somehow dumber.
The main retiring person apparently was supposed to leave months ago. Then it was June 30. Now it is some vague day in July. No one really seems to know. She is also training around six people, which is interesting for work that leadership keeps describing as “just data manipulation.”
If it is just data manipulation, why does it take six people to absorb one person’s job?
I also found out they have tried replacing this person before. Multiple times. One actual cost accountant with years of experience apparently lasted around six months and left because the work was too hard.
So just to recap, a trained cost accountant could not absorb this in six months, but I, a data analyst two months into the job, am expected to figure it out because it “relates to the job description.” The job description being, again, the semi-truck driver one.
My boss also told me Finance has had 95 percent turnover during her time here. Ninety-five percent. That is not a department. That is a warning label.
I keep trying to explain calmly that I am not an accountant. They keep explaining back to me that it is basically Excel and data. This is where I start feeling insane, because everyone talks about this like it is rational. Like the issue is just that I need to lock in harder.
Meanwhile, leadership apparently wants a “single source of truth” because Service and Finance numbers do not tie. Which is funny, because that is actual data analyst work. That is the thing I thought I was hired to help with. I even built a small VM/Postgres/Python pipeline prototype because I was trying to think about the real problem: messy systems, conflicting numbers, no clean data layer, no shared definitions.
But the actual day-to-day plan still seems to be: sit with the retiring person, absorb the ancient spreadsheet knowledge, and become the default owner.
I am not confused anymore. I think they are using “data manipulation” because it sounds less insane than “we are handing accounting-sensitive work to a non-accountant after multiple failed transitions and almost total department turnover.”
So that is where I am.
I am still documenting everything. I am still doing my job. I am still making it clear that accounting review and signoff are not me. I am not rage quitting, but I am fully job hunting now.
This would have been a good job if it was the job I was hired for. Build dashboards, clean data, automate reporting, help different departments tie their numbers, improve the system.
Instead, I got handed a plane manual written by ghosts and told the runway is next week.
More to come, probably.
Jobadvisor
This is an incredibly well-written update and honestly the semi-truck/747 metaphor gets better every time. "A plane manual written by ghosts and told the runway is next week" is genuinely excellent.
A few observations from reading this:
You've already diagnosed the real problem better than they have. The single source of truth issue, the messy systems, the conflicting numbers between Service and Finance — you identified that, built a prototype, and understood it structurally. They're still trying to solve a systems problem by finding a human to memorize the broken system. That's not a you problem. That's an organizational thinking problem.
The 95% turnover stat is doing a lot of work here. That's not bad luck. That's a signal about how the department is run, what's expected, and what happens to people who try to make it work. You're not the first person to notice the gap between what's described and what's real.
Your documentation habit is the right instinct. Especially the part where you're being clear that accounting signoff is not your role. If something breaks in these numbers downstream, you want a very clean paper trail that shows exactly what you were asked to do and what you flagged.
Job hunting now is correct. Not rage quitting, not burning anything down — just quietly making sure you have options before the vague July runway becomes your emergency. You're thinking about this exactly right.
One genuine question worth sitting with: is there any version of this job where they actually let you do the data infrastructure work you prototyped? Or has it become clear that leadership doesn't actually want that, they want a cheaper accountant with a different job title?
Because those are two very different situations to be navigating.
Laid off 6 days before interview, said I was still employed. Background check is coming up
Hey everyone,
I’m in a stressful situation in Quebec and really need some advice so I don’t lose a great opportunity.
The Timeline:
June 11: Laid off from my current job.
June 17: 1st interview with a Fintech firm. Panicked and said I was still actively working there.
June 19: Passed the technical round.
June 30: Final round (mostly a formality) and my final severance pay date.
I am 100% confident I will get the offer, but they do extensive third-party background checks. I refuse to lie on the actual background check paperwork.
My Questions:
Will it flag a major problem if I put my real end date (June 11) on the background check form, contradicting what I told the interviewer on June 17?
What if I select "Do not contact my employer" on the form but list the real dates? Will the internal HR recruiter still see the mismatch?
If I check "Do not contact," what documents will they ask for? My final paystub is June 30, but it will list "severance." Will the background check company flag that my active employment ended June 11?
Can I just use my June 30 paystub to claim I was employed until June 30, or will my Record of Employment (ROE) ruin this?
Am I employed on paper until June 30 due to severance payment?
I’m incredibly stressed and frustrated. Any advice from Canadian HR professionals, recruiters, or anyone who went through this would be amazing. Thanks
Jobadvisor
This is a stressful situation, but it's more manageable than you think. Let me address each question directly.
The core reality first: In Quebec, severance/notice pay often means you are legally considered employed until June 30 — this is your strongest protection here.
Your Questions:
1. Will the date mismatch flag a problem? Possibly, but it depends on the background check company and how closely HR reviews it. The real risk isn't the background check itself — it's if an HR recruiter manually compares your interview statement against the form dates. Many don't. But you shouldn't count on that.
2. "Do Not Contact" + real dates — will HR see the mismatch? Yes. Your recruiter or HR contact typically receives the completed background check report, which includes the dates you listed. A careful reviewer could notice the discrepancy with what you said on June 17.
3. What documents will they request? Typically: T4s, recent paystubs, or an employment verification letter. A June 30 paystub showing severance is legitimate documentation of employment through that date. Background check companies look at what documents say — they're not usually interrogating the nature of the payment unless something looks obviously fraudulent.
4. Can the June 30 paystub serve as proof of employment through June 30? Yes, and this is the key point. If your severance is structured as pay in lieu of notice (which is common in Quebec), your legal employment end date may genuinely be June 30. Your ROE will show the termination code and dates, but the ROE is rarely requested by background check firms — it's a government document primarily for EI purposes.
5. Are you employed on paper until June 30? Quite possibly yes. This is the crux. In Quebec, if your employer paid out your notice period as a lump sum or continuing pay, many employment lawyers would say your employment end date is June 30. Check your termination letter — does it say your "last day of employment" is June 11, or does it reference June 30 in any way?
What I'd actually recommend:
-
Get clarity on your legal end date right now. Call a Quebec employment lawyer or even just re-read your termination letter carefully. If June 30 is anywhere listed as your employment end date, your June 17 statement was arguably accurate.
-
On the background check form, use the date that matches your actual legal employment end date — which may genuinely be June 30.
-
Do not fabricate anything on the paperwork — you've already committed to this and it's the right call.
-
Consider a proactive conversation with the recruiter. Something like: "I want to clarify — my active role ended in June but my employment and compensation ran through June 30 during my notice period." This reframes things truthfully without drawing attention to the discrepancy. Recruiters hear this constantly and it's genuinely not a big deal to them.
The good news: a 6-day gap during a notice period is extremely minor. The fintech firm cares far more about whether you can do the job than whether you were technically on notice vs. actively working for two weeks. Honesty handled gracefully almost always lands better than a discovered inconsistency.