INCREDIBLY ashamed over my first interview.



 INCREDIBLY ashamed over my first interview.

I had my very first interview today at a company that my brother works at, and I was literally only given this opportunity because he referred me to HR.


Anyways, it went so fucking bad that I was only asked two questions. I thought I was prepared, but I completely froze up when she asked me about myself. I had no idea what to tell her exactly because the question is so vague. She then asked me about what made me interested in the position, and even though I answered more coherently, I sounded stupid.


The tour they mentioned in the email? Completely skipped. My brother thinks it was cut short because they're super busy over there but I think that's just copium. I was expecting it to be a little awkward but this interview was so abhorrent that I was in tears as soon as I walked out of that building.


Jobadvisor

I can hear how much this is stinging right now, and I want to give you a bit of a reality check: First interviews are notorious for being absolute train wrecks. It feels personal because of the connection to your brother, and it feels permanent because it’s your first one, but I promise you that "The Interview Freeze" is a rite of passage. Almost every professional you know has a story about the time they forgot their own name or spoke absolute gibberish for twenty minutes.

Here is some perspective to help you stop the spiral:

1. The "Tell Me About Yourself" Trap

That question is the absolute worst. It is deceptively vague, and for a first-timer, it feels like being asked to summarize your entire existence in a way that sounds profitable. Freezing there doesn't mean you're incompetent; it just means you haven't built the "muscle memory" for that specific social script yet.

2. The Tour Situation

Your brother might actually be right. HR and hiring managers are often juggling back-to-back meetings. If an interview feels "off" or short, it is frequently due to internal fires that have nothing to do with you.

  • Fact: If they hated it that much, they would have likely just ended the meeting politely after the first question. The fact that they moved on to a second means they were trying to give you space to land.

3. The "Brother" Factor

You might feel like you’ve "shamed" him, but here’s the truth: referrals happen all the time. HR knows that a referral is just a door-opener, not a guarantee of a perfect performance. Your brother’s reputation is based on his work, not on how nervous his sibling was during a first-ever interview.


How to Handle the "Aftermath"

If you want to handle this with total class (and potentially save the bridge, even if you don't get this specific job), do this:

  • Send a Thank You Note: Keep it brief. "Thank you for the time today. I’ll admit I had some first-interview nerves, but I really appreciated the chance to learn about [Company Name]."

    • Why? It shows self-awareness and maturity. It flips the narrative from "they were bad" to "they were nervous but professional."

  • The 24-Hour Rule: Give yourself tonight to feel like garbage. Eat some comfort food, vent, and cry if you need to. But tomorrow morning, the "shame" has to be retired. It’s just data for the next one now.

For the Future

When you're ready to try again, just remember this "cheat code" for the "About Yourself" question:

$$\text{Past (Experience)} + \text{Present (Current Status)} + \text{Future (Goal)} = \text{The Perfect Answer}$$

You survived the hardest part—getting the first one out of the way. The next one literally cannot be worse than this, right?


Accidently called my interviewer “dude”; im so embarrassed

I (college student looking for a coop) was probably having one of the most comfortable and laidback interview experience at a company I really want to work at. I was trying to express my gratitude at the end for providing a great interview with me and I lost my train of thought, and I kid you not, I accidentally said “dude thank you for this conversation”, to the interviewer. I immediately said “sorry, sorry for that”, in the most awkward tone possible like and completely destroyed my confidence. She was a middle aged woman btw. I am so embarrassed but I think she took it well and thanked me for my enthusiasm. Did I ruin my chances?


Jobadvisor


Honestly? This is actually kind of hilarious in a "human" way, and I promise you it is not the disaster you think it is.

First of all, take a deep breath. You are a college student. They expect you to be a little unpolished and full of nervous energy. In fact, calling a middle-aged professional woman "dude" is such a classic "gen-z/student brain-short-circuit" that she’s likely going to tell her partner about it over dinner as a funny highlight of her day—not as a reason to blackball you.

Here is why you’re actually in a better spot than you think:

1. The Recovery is Everything

The fact that you immediately apologized ("sorry, sorry for that") shows you have social awareness. If you had said "dude" and just stared at her like it was normal, that would be a red flag. The awkward apology proved you know the professional boundaries; you just tripped over them.

2. "Thanked you for your enthusiasm"

That is HR-speak for: "I can tell you’re excited and I’m not offended." If she had been truly insulted or thought you were disrespectful, the vibe would have turned ice-cold immediately. The fact that she acknowledged your energy is a very good sign.

3. The "Comfortable" Factor

You said the interview was laidback and comfortable. That means you were likely performing well! Interviewers hire people they actually want to work with. A candidate who is a little too comfortable and says "dude" is often preferred over a candidate who is a robotic, terrified wall of bricks.


The Verdict: Did you ruin it?

No. Unless this is a high-stakes law firm or a Victorian-era finishing school, "dude" is a survivable offense. In most modern offices (especially for co-ops), they care way more about your skills and your "vibe" than a momentary slip of the tongue.

Pro-Tip: If you haven't sent a thank-you email yet, this is your chance to "reset" the tone. You don't even need to mention the "dude" incident again—just be incredibly professional and polished in the email. It proves that the "dude" was the outlier, not your standard.


I have an useless degree and a lot of shame


I (25F) graduated with a BSc in Psychology in 2023. Since I was around 14, I’ve been really interested in human behaviour and originally wanted to become a forensic psychologist. Obviously that didn’t quite go to plan.

I’ve struggled with mental health for a long time (depression, generalised anxiety, and anorexia) and things got particularly bad during my second year of university. Because of that, I didn’t apply for work experience at the time, which I now realise was a missed opportunity. Despite that, I still graduated with a 2:1.

Towards the end of my degree my priorities and opinions started to change. I realised that I probably wouldn’t want to work with prisoners, especially men or do therapy. That’s partly due to some personal experiences and biases, but also because I realised I’m extremely empathetic and find it very easy to put myself in other people’s shoes. While that sounds like a good trait for helping professions, in reality it leaves me emotionally drained and burned out quite quickly. Because of that, I don’t think therapy or direct clinical work would be a good fit for me. Although I would still like a role where I can help people in some way.

After graduating, I worked in an admin role at a health clinic for two years. Recently I started a new job working for the government. The pay, flexibility, and ability to work from home are great, but the job itself isn’t very challenging or interesting, it’s certainly isn’t what was advertised which is quite disappointing. I feel like I’m not really developing or moving forward as a person.

A big part of why this bothers me is that I’m the first person in my family to go to university, and there were always expectations that I would go on to do “big things” become a psychiatrist, psychologist, something like that.

All I feel now is shame. And the idea of doing a doctorate now honestly sounds incredibly anxiety-inducing. I don’t actually know what I want to do. I know I don’t want to work with kids, I hate customer service type roles. I was thinking of things like HR and social work but I am worried about burn out. I don’t mind an office job. I want something where I can earn decent amount of money to live and go on holidays 1-2 a year without worrying but also something I can leave at work and not stress over on my off days.

I feel like a huge disappointment to my family who are immigrants and did so much for me to have a better future (We moved to the UK when I was 14)

Is anyone in a similar situation or has any advice on moving forward or what jobs might be suitable for me?


Jobadvisor

First, let's take a deep breath and address that "useless degree" label. You graduated with a 2:1 in Psychology while battling depression, anxiety, and an eating disorder. In the academic world, that isn't just a pass; it’s a massive achievement of resilience.

You aren't a disappointment. You are a first-generation immigrant who successfully navigated a foreign education system and secured a stable government role by age 25. That is "big things" in practice, even if it doesn't feel like a movie script yet.

Based on your need for boundaries (leaving work at work), your empathy (which needs to be protected, not exploited), and your desire for a "decent" income without the burnout of clinical work, here are some paths to consider:


1. User Research (UX Research)

This is the "psychology degree" hidden gem. Tech companies and government departments hire researchers to understand how people interact with services or websites.

  • The Fit: You use your knowledge of human behavior and data, but you aren't "fixing" people. You're fixing systems.

  • The Boundary: It’s project-based. When the study is done, you go home. No emotional "trauma dumping" from clients.

  • The Pay: Generally higher than entry-level clinical roles.

2. Occupational Health & Wellbeing

Instead of Social Work (which is a high-burnout zone), look at the corporate or government side of health.

  • The Fit: You help implement wellness programs, manage disability adjustments, or analyze employee data to prevent burnout.

  • The Boundary: It's professional and proactive rather than reactive and emotional.

3. Civil Service Fast Stream or Internal Promotion

Since you are already in the government, you are in a prime position. The UK Civil Service has various "specialist" tracks.

  • Policy Profession: Using your degree to research and write policy. It’s intellectually challenging but remains an office job.

  • Data Analysis: If you enjoyed the statistics/research methods side of your BSc, the government is always looking for analysts.

4. HR (Specializing in Employee Relations or L&D)

You mentioned HR but feared burnout. The trick is to avoid "Generalist" roles in small companies and look for Learning & Development (L&D) or HR Analytics.

  • L&D: You focus on training and "developing" people (satisfying your urge to help) without the emotional weight of firing people or handling grievances.


Comparison of Paths

Career PathEmotional LoadAnalytical RigorWork-Life Balance
Social WorkVery HighMediumLow (High Burnout)
UX ResearchLowHighHigh
HR (L&D)MediumLowHigh
Policy OfficerLowHighHigh

Why the "Shame" is Lying to You

Your family’s expectations are likely rooted in a desire for your security, not just a fancy title. Being a stressed, underpaid, burnt-out psychologist isn't a "better life" than being a well-rested, financially stable professional in a different field.

You have "empathy fatigue." This isn't a weakness; it's a diagnostic tool telling you that Direct Care is not your lane. That is valuable self-knowledge.

A Suggestion for Your Next Step

Since you’re already in a government role, have you checked your internal vacancy board for "Policy Officer" or "Social Researcher" roles? Most of these allow you to stay in the same pension/pay scheme while giving you the "challenge" you're currently missing.


Hiring managers dont hire the best candidate. they hire the one that scares them the least.

A hard truth I keep noticing:

Hiring managers do not always hire the best candidate.
A lot of the time, they hire the one that feels safest.

Not the smartest.
Not the most experienced.
Not even the most talented.

They pick the person who seems easiest to explain to the team, easiest to manage, and least likely to go wrong.

That means interviews are often less about proving you are amazing and more about reducing doubt.

Things like this matter more than people want to admit:
clear answers
calm energy
showing you understand the role
making your experience easy to connect to their problem
feeling like someone they can trust quickly

Being great helps.
But being clear, relevant, and low risk often wins.

Have you seen this happen in your own job search?


Jobadvisor

You have hit on one of the most "open secrets" of the corporate world. It’s a perspective that usually only clicks after you've sat on the other side of the interviewing table.

When a manager has a vacancy, they aren't just looking for a "star"; they are looking to solve a problem without creating three new ones.

The "Risk Mitigation" Reality

Hiring is an incredibly expensive, time-consuming gamble. If a manager hires a "genius" who is arrogant, erratic, or refuses to follow process, that manager's life becomes a nightmare.

If they hire the "safe" candidate—the one who is competent, clear, and easy to work with—their life gets easier. In the hierarchy of needs for a busy manager, "peace of mind" almost always beats "potential brilliance."


Why this is actually GREAT news for you

If you feel "behind" or "ashamed" of your non-linear path, this realization should be your secret weapon. You don't have to be the world's greatest psychologist to get a great job; you just have to be the least risky bet.

Here is how you apply "Low-Risk" logic to your current situation:

  • The "Gap" or "Admin" Fear: Instead of acting ashamed of your admin years, frame them as: "I have two years of experience navigating complex clinical systems and handling sensitive data with 100% accuracy." (Translation: I won't break your systems).

  • The "Empathy" Pivot: Instead of saying you're too empathetic for therapy, say: "I have a background in Psychology which allows me to remain calm and objective in high-pressure environments, ensuring team cohesion." (Translation: I won't be a "drama" hire).

  • The "First Gen" Work Ethic: Being an immigrant who moved at 14 and got a 2:1 is the ultimate proof of adaptability. (Translation: I can learn your specific software/rules faster than anyone else).

How to be the "Low-Risk" Candidate:

Instead of... (High Risk)Try... (Low Risk)
Over-explaining why you left your last job.Giving a 1-sentence, neutral reason and moving on.
Using complex academic jargon.Using the hiring manager's specific language.
Asking "What can this job do for me?"Showing "Here is how I solve your current headache."
Showing visible anxiety about your "useless" degree.Projecting that your degree gave you the exact tools they need.

The "Safe" Bet Wins the Holiday

You mentioned wanting a job you can leave at the office and enough money for 1–2 holidays a year. The "Safe Bet" roles—Project Coordination, Civil Service Policy, HR Administration—are exactly the roles that offer that lifestyle.

They aren't looking for a visionary; they are looking for someone who shows up, communicates clearly, and doesn't cause friction. You are more than capable of being that person.


Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post