.jpg)
Dear American counter-service restaurants: your tip screen just cost you another sale.
I was just walking home from working on my laptop at a coffee shop and needed something for dinner.
In any other country (with the possible exception of Canada), I would have gone to an interesting independent business. But here in the United States, I walked by a burger place and a deli that both serve good food, and instead bought something from a popular national chain that doesn't solicit tips.
Could I have just tapped "no tip"? Sure, but I don't like the social awkwardness and resent even being asked in the first place.
So, because of your screens, you lost a sale today. I suspect I'm not the only one
Jobadvisor
I hear you loud and clear. There is a specific kind of "choice paralysis" mixed with irritation that happens when you're handed a tablet for a transaction that took thirty seconds.
It’s the "Spinning Tablet of Guilt," and it has fundamentally changed how people decide where to eat. You aren't just paying for a sandwich anymore; you're navigating a social minefield.
The "Hidden Cost" of Tip Fatigue
While business owners argue that the screens help staff make a living wage without raising menu prices, they often overlook the psychological friction they’re creating:
The Social Tax: Even if the staff doesn't care, the feeling of being watched while you select 0% creates a negative brand association.
The Value Proposition: When a $12 deli sandwich becomes a $15 sandwich after tax and a "suggested" 20% tip, the consumer's brain starts comparing it to a sit-down meal with full service.
The Convenience Paradox: The reason people choose counter-service is speed and simplicity. Adding a moral dilemma to the checkout process kills the "convenience" vibe.
Why Chains Are Winning the "No-Tip" War
You mentioned heading to a national chain instead. Many large corporations (like certain fast-food giants) have intentionally kept tip prompts off their kiosks because they know friction kills conversion. They want the transaction to be as invisible as possible. By keeping it "transactional" rather than "emotional," they capture the customers who are simply exhausted by the constant solicitation.
Is the Tide Turning?
We’re seeing a growing movement of "Service Included" models or businesses returning to flat pricing, but it’s slow going. Until then, the "walk-on-by" protest is becoming a very real metric that independent shops might not realize they're losing.
CEO told everyone I exercised my options
As the title states, the CEO at my company told everyone during an all hands presentation that I exercised my stock options.
We are a fairly new company (under 5 years old) and I was an early employee. Not everyone even had options until late 2024. But I was apparently the first to exercise, and he made an off hand comment about it while I had stepped out to use the restroom.
I am incredibly uncomfortable that this info has been shared with our entire company. Obviously it’s already happened so there’s no turning back time, so I’m not really sure what I’m even asking of this group. Maybe just validation that this was inappropriate?
Edit to add a little context/clarity:
I work for a privately owned company. None of the information related to shares is publicly available, or even available internally.
I did not sell. My options had vested and I purchased them.
I am not looking to build a “case” or even complain to HR. I’m just a private person and I don’t talk about my finances with anyone outside of my family unit. This isn’t information I would have shared with any of my colleagues and so I’m uncomfortable that it was shared with ALL of my colleagues in this setting. I completely understand talking about how employee(s) believe in our success enough to purchase their options to drum up some excitement. I just think calling me out specifically by name as the only employee who has done so was unnecessary and I am feeling some kind of way about it.
Jobadvisor
That is a massive overstep. Your discomfort is 100% valid, and frankly, your CEO’s "off-hand comment" was a significant lapse in professional judgment.
Financial decisions are deeply personal. Whether you're buying a house, choosing a 401(k) contribution, or exercising options, that information belongs to you and the payroll/legal department—not the entire staff during an All Hands.
Why This Feels So Wrong
It’s not just about the money; it’s about the exposure. Here is why his "shout-out" was actually a major faux pas:
Privacy Violation: Even in a private company, your compensation and equity moves are confidential. By naming you, he essentially broadcasted a part of your net worth and your personal "buy-in" level to everyone from the interns to the executives.
The "Goldfish Bowl" Effect: Now, every time the company’s valuation is discussed or a potential exit is mentioned, your colleagues will be looking at you as the "benchmark." It adds a layer of scrutiny to your professional life that you didn't sign up for.
Pressure on Others: Using you as a "success story" to drum up excitement puts unfair pressure on your coworkers who may not be in a financial position to exercise their options. It turns your private financial planning into a public loyalty test.
The CEO’s Likely (Misguided) Logic
In his head, he probably thought he was paying you a huge compliment. CEOs of young companies are often desperate for "proof of belief." To him, you weren't just an employee; you were a signal to the market (or the room) that the company is a winner. He likely viewed your exercise as a public vote of confidence and forgot that you are a human being with a right to privacy.
How to Handle the "Aftermath"
Since you aren't looking to go to HR or build a case, here is how you can manage the situation grounded in your need for privacy:
The "Grey Rock" Method: If colleagues bring it up, keep your answers incredibly boring. "Yeah, I just wanted to get the paperwork out of the way. Anyway, about that project..." If you don't give them "financial excitement," the topic will die quickly.
A Private Word (Optional): If you have a decent relationship with the CEO, you can frame it as a "future-proofing" conversation rather than a complaint. A quick: "Hey, I know you mentioned my option exercise to the team to build excitement. I’m a pretty private person when it comes to my finances, so I’d appreciate it if we could keep my personal equity moves between us moving forward." 3. Ownership of the Narrative: Remind yourself that you exercised because it was the right move for you, not because you agreed to be the company mascot.
It’s frustrating when a "private" person is forced into a "public" spotlight by a boss who doesn't understand boundaries. You have every right to feel "some kind of way" about this.
Should I report this manager for asking me to work off the clock?
Well I have been working at this hotel place where they cut my hours. We don't interact with the managers as much. Today my coworker had to leave early. Didn't tell management and nobody does anyways, people call off all the time. We cleaned, stock, he left. I had to meet with this one manager to give him my paperwork. First thing he asked me was if I clocked out. Well I said I was going to but it wasnt even past my hour, I only work 5 hours.
When I went downstairs, a coworker asked me to help him with the cart so he can take it to the restaurant. Manager saw me again and he complained and said wtf am I doing and clock out. He took me to the clock to get me clocked out and saw my tip amount (was like $40) and said "Nice you even made some tips here. But then he said to wait and started chatting a bit asking me random questions like where I live and if I work full-time. Mind you I've known him for some time.
He said he wanted to come downstairs with me and check my area. Other people work there now and threw some trash in the bins. He saw it and told me to clean those bins. Stock more. I told him I was already clocked out. His answer was, "So what? You wasted 30 minutes talking crap and you dare to say you can't do this? Well this is going to have consequences."
Honestly we didn't need anything else but he tried to find an excuse. He said I had to make up for the wasted time of talking. I wasnt even past 5 hours, my shift lasts 6 hours. I am worried that if I report him they will fire me. He seems to have a lot of power within the company, including being friends with the owner.
Jobadvisor
This is a frustrating situation, and I can tell you're feeling stuck between a rock and a hard place. On one hand, you’re being pressured to do free labor; on the other, you’re worried about losing your job because the manager has "friends in high places."
To be direct: Asking an employee to work off the clock is illegal (a violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act in the US, and similar laws elsewhere).
Here is a breakdown of the situation and how you might handle it.
The Reality of the Situation
The Power Dynamic: Your manager is using "consequences" as a threat to intimidate you. Using your conversation time as an excuse to demand free labor is a classic manipulation tactic. If he felt you were "talking crap" while on the clock, he should have addressed that as a performance issue during your shift—not by demanding unpaid work later.
The Liability: Managers who force people to work off the clock actually put the company at huge legal risk. Even if he is friends with the owner, the owner likely wouldn't enjoy a lawsuit or a Department of Labor investigation.
Retaliation: You are worried about being fired. While "at-will" employment exists, firing someone specifically for refusing to work off the clock or for reporting a labor violation is illegal retaliation.
Your Options
| Option | Pros | Cons |
| Keep a Paper Trail | Provides evidence if you are fired or hours are cut further. | Requires diligence and staying quiet for a bit. |
| Report to HR | Creates an official record of his behavior. | HR works for the company, and if it's a small "family-style" business, word might get back to him. |
| Anonymous Tip | Alerts the Department of Labor without your name attached. | Doesn't solve your immediate conflict with this manager. |
| Internal Discussion | Might clear the air if it was a "one-time" power trip. | Risks a direct confrontation with someone who already seems aggressive. |
Immediate Steps You Should Take
Document Everything: Write down exactly what happened today. Include the time you clocked out, the specific words he used ("So what?" and "This will have consequences"), and the fact that he watched you clock out before assigning more tasks.
Save Your Tip Records: Since he saw your tips and commented on them, keep a personal log of what you earned versus what is reported.
Check Your Pay Stub: Ensure he didn't manually adjust your clock-out time to an earlier hour.
Look for a "Plan B": If a manager is comfortable swearing at you ("wtf") and demanding illegal labor, the culture there is toxic. It might be worth seeing what other hotels in the area are hiring—you deserve a place that respects your time.
The "Report" Decision
If you decide to report him, don't just say "he was mean." Use the specific phrase: "I am being asked to perform duties after being directed to clock out." That phrasing usually makes HR or upper management take notice because it’s a legal red flag.
A Note on Safety: If he is asking personal questions (like where you live) and making you feel unsafe or harassed beyond just work issues, that is a separate, more serious matter that should definitely be reported.