This simple change can help you have more effective meetings—and avoid unnecessary ones, says organizational psychologist




 This Meeting Could’ve Been an Email: How to Stop Wasting Time in Unnecessary Meetings

We’ve all been there. You glance at your calendar, see a meeting scheduled, and think, “This could’ve been an email.”

While effective meetings are vital for alignment and decision-making, they often become a black hole for productivity. We get roped into gatherings that feel unnecessary, eating into precious time we could be using to actually get work done.

So, how do we fix this? How do we ensure our meetings are purposeful and productive, not just another item on the to-do list?

 The Problem with "Because It's Thursday at 10 a.m."

According to Laura Vanderkam, author of several books on time management and productivity, the ideal meeting has a clear purpose.

> "A decision needs to be reached that couldn’t be reached without having all those people together."

Unfortunately, for many of us, the reason for a meeting is far less strategic.

> "All the reason that the meeting is happening is that it’s Thursday at 10 a.m."

This lack of purpose is the root of the problem. Too often, people enter a meeting without knowing *why* it’s happening or what it’s supposed to achieve. The agenda is a list of topics, not a clear objective.

The One Simple Swap That Will Transform Your Meetings

So, what’s the solution? It’s surprisingly simple, according to Steven Rogelberg, a leading expert on meeting science and author of *The Surprising Science of Meetings*.

The key is to make one small but powerful change to your meeting agenda.

Instead of framing your agenda as a list of **topics to be discussed**, reframe it as a set of **questions to be answered**.

Here’s why this small swap makes such a big difference:

*   **It forces you to define the purpose.** When you have to come up with questions, you are forced to stop and think, "Why am I having this meeting? What do we actually need to figure out?"

*   **It clarifies who needs to be there.** Once you have your questions, it becomes obvious who the relevant stakeholders are. You only invite the people who can help answer them.

*   **It provides a clear measure of success.** At the end of the meeting, you can easily tell if it was successful. Did you answer the questions on the agenda? If yes, the meeting was a success. If not, you know what still needs to be done.

And here’s the ultimate test:

> If you can’t think of any specific questions for your meeting, it likely means you don’t need a meeting at all.

 Beyond the Agenda: Other Ways to Improve Your Meetings

Of course, canceling unnecessary meetings is just one part of the solution. For the meetings you *do* need to have, Laura Vanderkam suggests thinking more creatively about their structure and timing.

"It seems crazy that all business decisions would be reached in exactly 30 or 60 minutes," she says.

Consider these tips:

*   **Shorten the meeting.** Try a 15-minute stand-up or a 25-minute block instead of the standard hour.

*   **Reduce the size.** Invite only the essential people. The more people in a meeting, the less efficient it often becomes.

*   **Reduce the frequency.** Can this be a bi-weekly check-in instead of a weekly one?

By being more intentional about our meetings, we can reclaim our time, boost productivity, and make sure that when we do gather, it’s for a truly valuable reason.

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post