Google’s 20% boomerang hire rate for AI engineers reveals a counterintuitive talent strategy: the same 2023 layoffs that signaled retreat from AI ambitions created a pre-vetted talent pool that now fuels the company’s competitive resurgence, turning a perceived weakness into recruitment advantage.
∙ Layoff-to-rehire pipeline: The 12,000 job cuts in early 2023 inadvertently created a curated list of Google-trained engineers who understand internal systems, culture, and infrastructure—reducing onboarding friction that slows competitor hires.∙ Compute as recruiting tool: Head of compensation John Casey explicitly cites Google’s “hefty computational infrastructure” as a talent magnet, confirming that access to training resources matters as much as compensation in AI hiring.
∙ Noam Shazeer as proof point: The Character.AI founder’s return—after leaving because Google “rebuffed” his chatbot ambitions—demonstrates the company’s cultural shift toward shipping faster and taking risks.
∙ Sergey Brin’s personal involvement: A co-founder coming out of retirement to personally recruit candidates signals existential prioritization that bureaucratic HR processes can’t match.
∙ Competitive pressure validated: Meta’s reported $100M signing bonuses and OpenAI’s aggressive retention efforts confirm the talent war is real, making Google’s boomerang strategy a cost-effective counter to compensation escalation.
The strategic implication extends beyond Google: companies that executed pandemic-era layoffs now possess an underutilized asset in their alumni networks. Former employees who’ve seen competitor operations return with comparative knowledge that pure external hires lack—making “boomerang programs” a legitimate talent strategy rather than an admission of hiring mistakes.
After a tough 2025 for people looking for a job, economists don't see much relief coming in 2026.
Here's what they're expecting next year:
- AI investments drive economic growth, but without creating many new jobs.
- Hiring remains sluggish, with health care likely to account for most job gains.
- Black unemployment, now at its highest rate in three years, could keep rising even if overall unemployment is stagnant.
- Wage growth slows further, with lower earners continuing to lag behind higher earners, deepening the "K-shaped" economy.
Here's what they're expecting next year:
- AI investments drive economic growth, but without creating many new jobs.
- Hiring remains sluggish, with health care likely to account for most job gains.
- Black unemployment, now at its highest rate in three years, could keep rising even if overall unemployment is stagnant.
- Wage growth slows further, with lower earners continuing to lag behind higher earners, deepening the "K-shaped" economy.
.webp)
Key takeaways:
- Rescission of Elon Musk’s compensation package by the Court of Chancery was improper because rescinding the compensation package would not be fair and would not restore Tesla or Mr. Musk to the status quo ante.
- The Court of Chancery erred when holding that Mr. Musk already had sufficient incentives based on his existing equity.
- The Court of Chancery incorrectly required Tesla and its board to provide an alternative to rescission, which was the Plaintiffs’ burden to establish as a correct remedy.
The order is a stark rejection of the Court of Chancery’s ruling in January 2024. That ruling itself was criticized as a departure from precedent and the prudent course of action previously taken by Delaware courts. Many companies reassessed their Delaware incorporation in its aftermath. That it took nearly two years for that error to be corrected will likely prompt additional assessments in Delaware and elsewhere.
https://lnkd.in/geZVuR5y